Anthropic’s $1.5B deal puts pressure on OpenAI in author lawsuits

Close-up of a polished brass balance scale with one pan stacked with open books and the other pan holding a swirling teal-blue cloud of luminous data ribbons and pixels, pages visibly transforming into code midair, bold warm gold versus cool cyan palette, bright clean studio background, no text or logos.

Anthropic has agreed to pay at least $1.5 billion to settle a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by a group of authors who alleged the company used pirated copies of their books to train large-language models, according to court documents. If approved by the court, the agreement would represent a landmark recovery in a U.S. copyright case, a lawyer for the authors said. According to NBC News, the suit focused on roughly 500,000 published works and alleged large-scale infringement tied to sources such as Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror.

The proposed payout and case background

Justin Nelson, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the proposed settlement amounts to a gross recovery of $3,000 per work and described the outcome as “nothing short of remarkable.” He noted in a memorandum to the judge that the $1.5 billion figure is the minimum size of the settlement. If the works list exceeds 500,000, Anthropic would pay an additional $3,000 for each work added above that threshold, Nelson wrote. Anthropic agreed to make four payments into the settlement fund, beginning with $300 million due within five business days of the court’s approval of the terms.

The lawsuit was filed last year in federal court in California by three writers: Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson. Bartz is a journalist and novelist, while Graeber and Johnson are journalists who have published nonfiction books. NBC News reported that the authors did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Context from a key court ruling

In late June, the federal judge assigned to the case, William Alsup, ruled that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constituted fair use because the output was “exceedingly transformative,” but he also held that downloading pirated copies of books did not qualify as fair use. Anthropic had argued that its practices fell under U.S. fair use law.

Statements and broader implications

Aparna Sridhar, Anthropic’s deputy general counsel, said the settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims and reiterated the company’s commitment to developing safe AI systems that help people and organizations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems. According to NBC News, the settlement could influence other pending litigation involving AI platforms and authors.

Nearly 20 bestselling authors, including John Grisham, George R.R. Martin and Jodi Picoult, have sued OpenAI, alleging “systematic theft on a mass scale” for using their works to train ChatGPT and related tools. The Anthropic agreement arrives as those cases continue to move forward.

Total
0
Shares
Pridaj komentár

Vaša e-mailová adresa nebude zverejnená. Vyžadované polia sú označené *

Previous Post
A gleaming set of golden justice scales in the center, one pan holding a neatly stacked pile of hardback books with colorful cloth covers, the other pan containing a glowing crystalline AI cube made of luminous nodes and filaments, suspended in a bright neutral studio space with soft haze, warm golds against cool electric blues, crisp close-up medium framing, shallow depth of field, high contrast and glossy reflections, no text or logos.

Anthropic Agrees to Pay $1.5 Billion to Settle Authors‘ Copyright Suit Over AI Training

Next Post
A gleaming gold balance scale on a minimalist pedestal holds a stack of richly textured hardcover books on one side and a glowing crystalline AI cube emitting electric-blue light on the other, pages morphing into pixels around it, bright high-key scene with warm gold versus cool blue contrast, centered medium shot, no text or logos.

Largest Copyright Recovery Ever? Anthropic’s $1.5B Deal Could Recast AI Training Fights

Related Posts